Skip to main content
Published May 16, 2026 · 14 Sections

2026 US Import Tariff Report:
Section 301, 232, IEEPA & USMCA

📅 May 16, 2026 📋 Version 1.0 🏛️ Sources: USTR, CBP, CIT, Federal Register

Executive Summary — Key Findings

  • Combined duty rates on Chinese goods can reach 145%+ for electronics and consumer goods
  • Section 232 steel tariffs increased to 50% as of April 7, 2026 — up from 25%
  • Section 122 tariffs (10% baseline) invalidated by CIT on May 7, 2026 — refund window open
  • $166B+ in IEEPA refunds available via CAPE portal for qualifying entries
  • Section 301 remedy determinations for 16+ economies due July 24, 2026 — most consequential tariff date of 2026
  • De minimis threshold collapsed from $800 → $50 for most countries; eliminated for China
  • USMCA joint review scheduled July 1, 2026 — rules of origin compliance is critical
Published: May 16, 2026 · Sources: USTR, CBP, Court of International Trade, Federal Register, USITC · View Sources
⚠️ Critical Dates: May 7 — Section 122 invalidated, file refunds now · July 1 — USMCA review · July 24 — Section 301 determinations for 16+ economies

US Import Tariff Landscape Overview (May 2026)

The current US tariff structure is not a single number — it's a stack of up to five overlapping duties that apply simultaneously depending on the product and origin country. The 2026 tariff landscape is the most complex in modern history.

Tariff Layer Authority Rate Status
Section 301 Trade Act 1974 7.5%–145% Active (China, some other economies)
Section 232 Trade Expansion Act 1962 25%–50% Active (steel, aluminum)
Section 122 IEEPA 10% baseline ⚠️ INVALIDATED May 7, 2026
Reciprocal tariffs IEEPA (proclaimed) Varies by country Paused / negotiating for most
Retaliatory (§301) Trade Act 1974 0%–84% Active (targeted economies)
De minimis CBP 0% (exempt) Eliminated for China; $50 for others
Example tariff stack for Chinese consumer electronics: Section 301 List 3 (25%) + April 2025 escalation (84%) = 109%+ effective duty rate before freight and insurance.
Example tariff stack for Chinese-origin steel: Section 232 (50%) + Section 301 derivatives (25%–75%) + retaliatory (up to 25%) = 75%–100%+ effective rate.
🧮
Calculate your total landed cost Enter your product and origin country to see the full tariff stack

Section 301 Tariffs — Current Status

Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 is the primary authority for US tariffs on Chinese goods and targeted third-country goods. These tariffs were initiated in 2018, expanded through 2024, and escalated to 84% additional duties on all remaining Chinese goods in April 2025.

2A. Timeline of Section 301 Tariffs on China

DateActionScopeRate
July 6, 2018List 1~$34B of goods25%
August 23, 2018List 2~$16B of goods25%
September 24, 2019List 3~$300B of goods15%
February 14, 2020Phase 1 deal50% of List 1 reduced7.5%–15%
May 14, 2024Biden tariff hikesEVs, solar, batteries, semiconductors100%+ on some
April 8, 2025Trump escalationAll remaining Chinese goods+84% additional

2B. Current Section 301 Rates by Product Category (China)

Product CategoryHTS RangeSection 301 Rate
EVs and lithium batteries8708.10–8708.99100%
Solar cells and panels8541.40–8541.5050%
Semiconductors8541.10–8541.4050%–100%
Medical equipment9018–902250%–100%
Steel products7206–721025%–75%
Aluminum products7601–761010%–75%
Consumer electronics (smartphones)8517.130% (currently exempt)
Consumer electronics (laptops/tablets)8471.300% (currently exempt)
Toys and games9503–950625%–35%
Textiles and apparel50xx–63xx chapters25%–35%
Furniture94xx chapters25%–35%
April 2025 escalation (all remaining)All remaining+84% additional
Note on exemptions: Smartphones and laptops are currently exempt from Section 301. This status may change following the July 24, 2026 remedy determinations. Monitor USTR announcements closely.
🔍
Find your HTS code and Section 301 rate Free AI-powered classification — results in seconds

Section 232 Tariffs — Steel, Aluminum & Derivatives

Section 232 tariffs on steel were increased from 25% to 50% effective April 7, 2026. USMCA-compliant goods from Canada and Mexico remain at 0% — creating a significant cost advantage for importers who can document North American origin.

3A. Current Steel Tariffs

ProductOriginRateEffective Date
Steel articlesAll countries50%April 7, 2026
Steel articlesCanada (USMCA compliant)0%USMCA compliant
Steel articlesMexico (USMCA compliant)0%USMCA compliant
Steel articlesAustralia0%Bilateral agreement
Steel derivative productsVarious25%–50%April 2025

3B. Current Aluminum Tariffs

ProductOriginRateEffective Date
Aluminum articlesAll countries25%April 7, 2026
Aluminum articlesCanada (USMCA compliant)0%USMCA compliant
Aluminum articlesMexico (USMCA compliant)0%USMCA compliant
Aluminum articlesAustralia0%Bilateral agreement
Duty savings opportunity: USMCA-compliant steel from Canada and Mexico saves 50 percentage points versus third-country steel. Importers who can document USMCA origin should prioritize this classification.

Section 122 Tariffs — Invalidated May 7, 2026

On April 2, 2025 ("Liberation Day"), President Trump imposed a 10% baseline tariff on all imports under IEEPA authority. On May 7, 2026, the Court of International Trade (CIT) ruled that this exceeded presidential authority and invalidated Section 122 tariffs, ordering CBP to process refunds.

Action required now: All Section 122 tariffs collected are subject to refund. Review your entry history for 10% baseline tariff payments and file via the CAPE portal. This refund window may be time-limited pending any appeal.

How to File for Section 122 Refunds

  1. 1 Access the CAPE portal at cbp.gov/cape (requires ACE account)
  2. 2 Identify entries with Section 122 duties paid (10% baseline IEEPA tariff)
  3. 3 File a CAPE declaration with your refund claim and supporting documentation
  4. 4 For complex entries, consult a licensed customs broker
  5. 5 Monitor for appeal status — the ruling may be challenged by DOJ
💰
IEEPA Refund Guide: Step-by-step CAPE portal filing Full walkthrough of the refund process — ACE account setup, eligible entries, documentation

Reciprocal & Retaliatory Tariffs

Reciprocal tariff rates vary significantly by economy. Most countries are in active negotiations with reduced or paused rates. China faces the highest rates — 84% reciprocal on top of existing Section 301 duties.

5A. Current Reciprocal Tariff Rates by Economy

EconomyReciprocal RateNotes
China84%Plus Section 301 — highest combined rate
European Union20% (paused at 10%)Under negotiation
United Kingdom10%Bilateral framework in progress
Japan10%Bilateral framework in progress
South Korea10%–25%USKOR agreement
Taiwan10%–32%ART framework
Vietnam46% (negotiating)High rate under review
India26% (negotiating)Under review
Canada25% (USMCA exempt)USMCA rules apply for qualifying goods
Mexico10% (USMCA exempt)USMCA rules apply for qualifying goods

De Minimis Threshold Changes

The $800 de minimis exemption — previously one of the highest in the world — has been dramatically curtailed. Chinese goods no longer qualify, and the threshold for all other countries was reduced from $800 to $50.

OriginDe Minimis ThresholdStatus
ChinaEliminatedAs of May 2, 2025. Full duties + Section 301 apply
EU$50Reduced from $800
All other countries$50Reduced from $800
Canada (USMCA)$50Pending review
Mexico (USMCA)$50Pending review
E-commerce impact example: A $50 Chinese consumer product that cost $0 in duties under de minimis now incurs $42+ in duties (84% effective rate). Direct-to-consumer brands sourcing from China face fundamental unit economics changes.

IEEPA Refund Programs — $166B+ Available

Importers who paid Section 232 and Section 301 duties may be eligible for refund via the CAPE portal for entries paid under IEEPA authority. The CIT's May 7, 2026 ruling on Section 122 significantly expanded the pool of eligible refund claims.

$166B+
Estimated total refund pool (Section 232 + Section 301 + Section 122)
CAPE
CBP's portal for filing IEEPA refund declarations (cbp.gov/cape)
Phase I
Currently covers straightforward entries; Phase II for complex entries TBD

How to File via CAPE Portal

  1. 1 Register for the ACE portal at cbp.gov/ace
  2. 2 Identify eligible entries — look for IEEPA-authority duty payments in your entry history
  3. 3 Obtain customs broker assistance for complex entries with multiple duty layers
  4. 4 File CAPE declaration — Phase I covers straightforward entries now
  5. 5 Track refund status via ACE portal; Phase II launch date TBD

USMCA Review — July 1, 2026

USMCA-compliant goods from Canada and Mexico receive preferential duty treatment. Rules of origin require minimum 70%–75% regional value content (RVC). The joint USMCA review is scheduled for July 1, 2026 — the first formal review since the agreement entered force in 2020.

Why USMCA compliance is critical in 2026: USMCA-compliant steel pays 0% Section 232 duty vs. 50% for third-country steel. USMCA-compliant aluminum pays 0% vs. 25%. The savings per shipment can be substantial for high-volume importers.

What Importers Should Do Before July 1, 2026

  1. 1 Audit current sourcing — identify which imports from Canada and Mexico qualify for USMCA
  2. 2 Update supplier documentation — ensure certificates of origin are current and accurately reflect RVC
  3. 3 Calculate RVC for affected products — minimum 70%–75% regional value content required
  4. 4 Review supply chain routing — ensure goods aren't transshipped through non-USMCA countries
📄
Generate a USMCA Certificate of Origin Free AI-assisted document generation — compliant with USMCA Article 5.2

Section 301 Remedy Determinations — July 24, 2026

July 24, 2026 is the statutory deadline for the Trump administration to announce Section 301 remedy determinations for investigations covering 16+ economies. This is the most consequential tariff date of 2026.

Potential outcomes: No new tariffs (current structure maintained) · Targeted new tariffs (15%–50% on specific sectors) · Broad tariff expansion ($100B+ in additional goods) · China escalation (possible 100%+ on remaining Chinese goods)

Action Items Before July 24

  1. 1 Classify all products — ensure HTS codes are accurate for all imported goods
  2. 2 Check current tariff exposure — identify which economies and products are under active investigation
  3. 3 Identify product substitutions — assess lower-tariff origin alternatives for high-risk SKUs
  4. 4 Pre-position inventory — consider 60–90 day safety stock for products likely to face new tariffs
  5. 5 Review supplier contracts — add tariff pass-through provisions before determinations are announced

Forced Labor Enforcement — 60+ Economies

US CBP continues to enforce Withhold Release Orders (WROs) and findings under the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA). The UFLPA creates a rebuttable presumption that goods produced wholly or in part in Xinjiang are made with forced labor.

60+
Economies under active forced labor enforcement scrutiny
$400M+
Goods detained at US ports in 2024
UFLPA
Rebuttable presumption applies to Xinjiang-origin goods in supply chain

Major enforcement categories include electronics, solar panels, textiles, polysilicon, and agricultural products. Importers must maintain complete supply chain documentation and be prepared to demonstrate UFLPA compliance at the port of entry.

🔎
Screen your suppliers for OFAC, BIS, and UFLPA exposure Check against 6 denied-party databases — results in seconds

Total Landed Cost Examples — Tariff Stacking

These examples illustrate the full tariff stack and total landed cost for common import scenarios. All examples assume $100 FOB value.

Chinese Consumer Electronics
HTS: 8471.xx, List 3 goods
FOB value$100.00
Section 301 (List 3)+$25.00
April 2025 escalation+$84.00
Freight & insurance+$5.00
Total Landed Cost$214.00
Effective duty rate: 109% of FOB
Chinese-Origin Steel
Section 232 + Section 301 stacked
FOB value$100.00
Section 232 tariff+$50.00
Section 301 (steel)+$25.00
Freight & insurance+$8.00
Total Landed Cost$183.00
Effective duty rate: 75% of FOB
USMCA-Compliant Canadian Steel
Section 232 exempt via USMCA
FOB value$100.00
Section 232 (USMCA exempt)$0
Freight & insurance+$10.00
Total Landed Cost$110.00
Effective duty rate: 0% of FOB

HTS Code Classification

Every tariff analysis starts with correct HTS classification. Misclassification is the leading cause of CBP penalty cases — resulting in either underpayment (penalties, interest, retroactive assessment) or overpayment (unnecessary cost).

Misclassification penalties: Up to 4× the unpaid duties for gross negligence. CBP issued over $600M in penalty claims related to misclassification in FY2024. Importers are legally responsible for entry accuracy even when using a licensed broker.

How to Find Your HTS Code

  1. 1 Use the USTradeStack HTS Classifier — free AI-powered classification with CBP references
  2. 2 Cross-reference with USITC DataWeb (dataweb.usitc.gov)
  3. 3 Work with a licensed customs broker for complex multi-component products
  4. 4 Request a CBP binding ruling for certainty on high-value products

Savings Opportunities by Product Category

Sourcing shifts from China to alternative origins can yield significant duty reductions. These estimates reflect 2026 effective rates and assume comparable product quality and logistics costs.

Product CategoryBest Alternative OriginPotential Duty Savings
Steel (Section 232) Canada or Mexico (USMCA compliant) 50% → 0% = 50pp
Aluminum (Section 232) Canada or Mexico (USMCA compliant) 25% → 0% = 25pp
Electronics (China) Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia 109% → 25–50% = 59–84pp
Solar panels (China) Southeast Asia 50%+ → 10–25% = 25–40pp
Textiles (China) India, Bangladesh, Vietnam 34%+ → 10–20% = 14–24pp
Consumer goods (China) India, Indonesia, Mexico 109%+ → 15–30% = 79–94pp
Auto parts (China) Mexico (USMCA compliant) 27%+ → 0–5% = 22–27pp
🌐
Find the lowest-duty origin for your product FTA Optimizer compares duty rates across 14 US trade agreement partners

Recommendations for US Importers — Action Plan 2026

Immediate Actions (Now)

  1. 1 Audit all active import lines for Section 301 and Section 232 exposure
  2. 2 Check HTS codes — are all products correctly classified?
  3. 3 Identify USMCA-compliant sourcing from Canada and Mexico for steel, aluminum, and auto parts
  4. 4 File IEEPA refund claims via CAPE portal for Section 122 overpayments

By July 1, 2026 (USMCA Review)

  1. 5 Obtain USMCA certificates of origin from all Canadian and Mexican suppliers
  2. 6 Calculate regional value content (RVC) for all products claiming USMCA preference
  3. 7 Audit supply chain routing for USMCA eligibility

By July 24, 2026 (Section 301 Determinations)

  1. 8 Identify at-risk product categories under active Section 301 investigation
  2. 9 Pre-position inventory — consider 60–90 day safety stock for high-risk SKUs
  3. 10 Review supplier contracts for tariff pass-through provisions

Ongoing

  1. 11 Monitor tariff negotiations — rates for EU, Japan, India, Vietnam are in active flux
  2. 12 Track IEEPA refund window — Phase II CAPE launch date TBD
  3. 13 Review forced labor compliance for all Xinjiang-adjacent supply chains

Appendix A: Key Dates 2026

DateEventAction Required
May 7, 2026 Section 122 invalidated by CIT File IEEPA refund claims via CAPE portal
July 1, 2026 USMCA joint review Ensure USMCA compliance documentation is current
July 24, 2026 Section 301 remedy determinations (16+ economies) Pre-position inventory; review sourcing alternatives
TBD CAPE Phase II launch File complex entry refund claims

Appendix B: Key Resources

USTradeStack HTS Classifier ustradestack.ai/classify Free AI-powered HTS code lookup
USTradeStack Calculator ustradestack.ai/calculate Total landed cost calculator
USTradeStack IEEPA Guide ustradestack.ai/ieepa-refund-guide Step-by-step CAPE refund filing guide
CAPE Portal (CBP) cbp.gov/cape File IEEPA refund claims
CBP ACE Portal cbp.gov/ace Entry filing and duty management
USITC DataWeb dataweb.usitc.gov HTS classification and trade data
USTR Trade Toolbox ustr.gov/trade-toolbox Official tariff resources
USMCA Certificate Template ustr.gov/USMCA Certificate of origin forms

Frequently Asked Questions

Section 301 tariff rates on Chinese goods in 2026 range from 7.5% to 145%+, depending on the product category. EVs and lithium batteries face 100% rates, solar cells and panels face 50%, and general consumer goods face 25%–35% on Lists 1–3. The April 2025 escalation added 84% additional tariffs on all remaining Chinese goods, pushing combined effective rates on electronics and consumer goods to 109%–145%+. See Section 2 for the full product category breakdown.
File via the CAPE portal at cbp.gov/cape (requires an ACE account). Identify entries where IEEPA-authority duties were paid, gather entry documentation, and file a CAPE declaration. Phase I covers straightforward entries. The May 7, 2026 CIT ruling also opened a refund window for the 10% Section 122 baseline tariff. An estimated $166B+ in refunds is available. See our full IEEPA Refund Guide for the complete walkthrough.
The USMCA joint review is scheduled for July 1, 2026. USMCA-compliant goods from Canada and Mexico receive preferential duty treatment, including 0% Section 232 duty on steel (vs. 50% for non-USMCA) and 0% on aluminum (vs. 25%). Rules of origin require minimum 70%–75% regional value content. Before July 1, audit sourcing, update certificates of origin, and calculate RVC for all affected products.
The de minimis exemption for Chinese shipments was eliminated entirely as of May 2, 2025. Chinese goods that previously entered duty-free now face 84%+ effective rates. For all other countries, the threshold dropped from $800 to $50. A $50 product from China that cost $0 in duties now incurs $42+ in duties. E-commerce brands and direct-to-consumer sellers sourcing from China face fundamental unit economics changes.
July 24, 2026 is the statutory deadline for Section 301 remedy determinations covering 16+ economies. Before this date: (1) classify all imported goods by HTS code, (2) identify current tariff exposure for products under active investigation, (3) identify lower-tariff origin alternatives, (4) pre-position 60–90 day safety stock for high-risk categories, and (5) review supplier contracts for tariff pass-through provisions. See Section 9 for the full action plan.