Importing from 🇨🇳 China vs 🇻🇳 Vietnam
Tariffs, costs & compliance compared — so you can make the right sourcing call.
At a Glance: China vs Vietnam
| Factor | 🇨🇳 China | 🇻🇳 Vietnam |
|---|---|---|
| US Trade Rank | #1 | #7 |
| Annual US Imports | $427B | $137B |
| Trade Agreement | No FTA | No FTA |
| Avg Duty Rate | 19.3% (incl. Section 301) | 12.7% average (apparel/footwear heavy) |
| Section 301 Surcharge | ⚠ Applies · Lists 1–4A: 7.5%–25% on most | ✓ None |
| Section 232 (Steel/Alum) | ⚠ 25% on steel, 10% on aluminum | ⚠ 25% steel, 10% aluminum Sectio |
| Compliance Complexity | ⚠ Very High Complexity | ● Medium Complexity |
| Ocean Transit to US | 14–30 days (ocean) | 18–35 days (ocean) |
Trade Agreement: No FTA
MFN Status: Normal Trade Relations (NTR)
- Electronics
- Machinery
- Apparel
- Furniture
- Toys
- Plastics
Transit to US: 14–30 days (ocean) · 5–8 days (air)
Main Ports: Shanghai, Shenzhen, Ningbo, Guangzhou
High-frequency direct service to all major US ports. Volume keeps per-unit freight competitive.
Section 301 additional duties of 7.5%–25% apply to virtually all product categories. UFLPA rebuttable presumption applies to Xinjiang goods.
Full China Profile →Trade Agreement: No FTA (IPEF — not in force)
MFN Status: MFN/WTO Member
- Electronics
- Footwear
- Apparel
- Furniture
- Machinery
- Plastics
Transit to US: 18–35 days (ocean) · 5–9 days (air)
Main Ports: Ho Chi Minh City, Haiphong, Danang
Growing capacity. Some congestion at HCMC. Trans-shipment via Singapore common for LCL.
Anti-circumvention investigations ongoing. Vietnam-origin goods must demonstrate substantial transformation, not merely assembly from Chinese inputs.
Full Vietnam Profile →Illustrative Landed Cost: $50,000 Electronics Shipment
Based on $50,000 FOB product value. Duty rate reflects typical electronics treatment. Freight is estimated ocean FCL. Actual costs vary by HTS code, Incoterms, carrier, and shipment size.
| Cost Component | 🇨🇳 China | 🇻🇳 Vietnam |
|---|---|---|
| FOB Product Value | $50,000 | $50,000 |
| Customs Duties (25% incl. S301) | $12,500 | $2,500 |
| Est. Ocean Freight | $4,000 | $4,000 |
| MPF + HMF (US Fees) | $236 | $236 |
| Total Estimated Landed Cost | $66,736 | $56,736 |
That's a 15–18% cost difference. At scale (e.g., 12 shipments/year), that's ~$120,000/year. Run your actual product for precise numbers.
Enter Your Product & See the Real Numbers
Your HTS code, shipment size, and Incoterms make a big difference. Get a precise cost breakdown for China vs Vietnam in under 60 seconds.
Regulatory Differences: China vs Vietnam
UFLPA forced-labor screening required for Xinjiang-origin goods. Importer certifications may apply.
Transshipment risk — CBP scrutinizes goods routed through Vietnam to avoid China Section 301 duties. Country of origin rules strictly enforced.
Accurate country-of-origin marking (19 CFR Part 134), proper HTS classification, CBP entry filing, and applicable agency certifications (FDA, USDA, EPA, CPSC depending on product). Work with a licensed customs broker to confirm requirements for your specific goods.
China vs Vietnam: 2026 Sourcing Analysis
The Duty Cost Gap: China vs Vietnam
At comparable shipment values, the duty cost difference between China and Vietnam is material. China's blended effective rate of 19.3% (incl. Section 301) (including Section 301 surcharges) compares against Vietnam's 12.7% average (apparel/footwear heavy). On a $50,000 shipment, that gap translates to roughly $3,300 in additional customs duties for China-origin goods. At 12 shipments per year, the annual cost difference reaches approximately $39,600 — a figure large enough to justify a formal sourcing review. The Section 301 surcharges on China goods — Lists 1–4A: 7.5%–25% on most goods — are the dominant cost driver and apply in addition to MFN base rates on virtually all product categories.
What Products Import Better from China vs Vietnam
China is a dominant US import source for Toys — categories where Vietnam has limited or no comparable export volume to the US. However, the Section 301 surcharge on China goods means importers of these products face significantly higher landed costs than the MFN base rate suggests. Vietnam leads US import volumes in Footwear — product categories where China's export mix provides little direct competition. For shared categories (Electronics, Machinery), duty rate differences and compliance obligations are the deciding factors. Use the HTS Classifier to identify the exact duty rate for your specific product from each origin.
Compliance Complexity: China vs Vietnam
China presents a Very High compliance burden compared to Vietnam's Medium profile. China: UFLPA forced-labor screening required for Xinjiang-origin goods. Importer certifications may apply. Section 232 steel and aluminum duties apply to China-origin goods (25% on steel, 10% on aluminum imports from China), creating an additional tariff layer for metal-containing products. Vietnam: Transshipment risk — CBP scrutinizes goods routed through Vietnam to avoid China Section 301 duties. Country of origin rules strictly enforced. Section 232 steel and aluminum duties also apply to Vietnam-origin goods (25% steel, 10% aluminum Section 232 duties apply). In practice, compliance complexity affects total cost beyond just duty rates — it influences broker fees, documentation overhead, examination rates, and the risk of CBP seizure or penalty. Run a compliance check to identify every agency requirement for your specific product from China or Vietnam.
Which Is Better for US Imports: China or Vietnam?
The right sourcing decision depends on your product category, HTS classification, shipment volume, and tolerance for compliance complexity. Here's the key decision logic:
Goods from China face Section 301 additional duties of Lists 1–4A: 7.5%–25% on most goods, significantly increasing costs. Vietnam is not subject to Section 301 — typically 10–25 percentage points cheaper on most product categories.
Importing from China vs Vietnam: Common Questions
Vietnam is generally cheaper for most US imports due to the absence of Section 301 surcharges. China faces additional duties of Lists 1–4A: 7.5%–25% on most goods, which can add 7.5%–25% on top of MFN rates. China may still be competitive for product categories excluded from Section 301 lists.
Neither China nor Vietnam currently has a comprehensive free trade agreement with the US. Both are subject to MFN duty rates — China at 19.3% (incl. Section 301) and Vietnam at 12.7% average (apparel/footwear heavy) on average.
China is subject to Section 301 tariffs: Lists 1–4A: 7.5%–25% on most goods. Vietnam is NOT subject to Section 301 tariffs. For steel and aluminum: China faces Section 232 steel/aluminum duties: 25% on steel, 10% on aluminum imports from China. Vietnam faces Section 232 steel/aluminum duties: 25% steel, 10% aluminum Section 232 duties apply.
For electronics, Vietnam is typically the better choice. Most electronics (laptops, phones, components) from China face Section 301 surcharges of 7.5%–25%, dramatically increasing landed costs. Vietnam has no Section 301 exposure — electronics are subject only to MFN rates, which are 0% for most tech products under the WTO Information Technology Agreement.
China: UFLPA forced-labor screening required for Xinjiang-origin goods. Importer certifications may apply. Vietnam: Transshipment risk — CBP scrutinizes goods routed through Vietnam to avoid China Section 301 duties. Country of origin rules strictly enforced. Both origins require accurate country-of-origin marking (19 CFR Part 134) and proper HTS classification. Consult a licensed customs broker for origin-specific requirements.
HTS Classification Report — $29
See your complete duty stack for both China and Vietnam: HTS breakdown, Section 301/IEEPA exposure, alternative classifications, and a broker-ready PDF.
Deep-Dive Tariff Profiles
Other Country Comparisons to Consider
Tariff comparisons sourced from USITC HTS Schedule and USTR Section 301 lists as of 2026-07-04. Sample landed cost figures are illustrative estimates only — actual costs depend on HTS classification, Incoterms, carrier rates, and current trade policy. Section 301 product lists, trade agreement rules of origin, and duty rates change frequently. Verify all rates with a licensed customs broker before making sourcing decisions. AI-assisted analysis — not legal or customs advice.